| Raise the lvl requirement | |
|
+4Afridity chanman Muramasas _Hate_Time_ 8 posters |
Author | Message |
---|
_Hate_Time_ Moderators
Posts : 6 Join date : 2010-01-26
| Subject: Raise the lvl requirement Wed Jan 27, 2010 12:24 am | |
| I know i'm making a lot of suggestions and I just got back into faction tonight lol. But what good is forum without posts so. Another thing i would like to discuss is the level requirement for the guild. I noticed that it is at 20+. But right now would be the time to raise the bar a little. Because I see there are lots of inactive lowbies on roster. If you raised the lvl requirement just a little to like 40+ or 50+ i think we would benefit a lot for two reasons. One, lots of people will start a character and work on it until lvl 20 or 30 and then decide to make new character cuz they don't like the one they made. Thus you have lots of inactive lowbies being sweeped from the roster weekly. But if lvl Requirement was higher, chances are that someon who works on character up to lvl 40-50 they are not just going to up and quit and make new one. And reason two, because most of us that have been in guild for a while are starting to reach the mid to high lvl and we could all help each other out a lot more if everyone in guild was same lvl. Think about it there would always be someone on that could help, and you would still be getting quests or BH or bosses that you need too. Instead of having to take time off of your leveling to help someone lower lvl on their quests or boss everyone would mostly need same bossed and same fb's bh's if the majority of us were same level. Once again just my opinion. | |
|
| |
Muramasas Moderators
Posts : 1 Join date : 2010-01-08
| Subject: Re: Raise the lvl requirement Wed Jan 27, 2010 8:29 am | |
| I like the idea of 4x's or 5x's minimum req but most of them are already in factions by that time. We'd have to try to use some salesmanship to get them to come to us haha. | |
|
| |
chanman Moderators
Posts : 81 Join date : 2010-01-09 Age : 33
| Subject: Re: Raise the lvl requirement Wed Jan 27, 2010 3:48 pm | |
| i say go to 25-30 but let the 20s stay as long as there active | |
|
| |
Afridity Admin
Posts : 54 Join date : 2010-01-08 Age : 61 Location : California
| Subject: Re: Raise the lvl requirement Thu Jan 28, 2010 12:12 am | |
| UR RIGHT!!! i will make some changes soon ty for ur thoughts | |
|
| |
chanman Moderators
Posts : 81 Join date : 2010-01-09 Age : 33
| Subject: Re: Raise the lvl requirement Thu Jan 28, 2010 12:32 am | |
| | |
|
| |
ColdStrike Moderators
Posts : 67 Join date : 2010-01-12 Age : 30 Location : Calgary
| Subject: i think we should.. Tue Feb 16, 2010 8:45 am | |
| i think hateyime is completely right.i mean .. were outlaws we need to help eachother but i have another thoght. i think we should be 50+... b'cause the stronger the better.... | |
|
| |
TrueNicor
Posts : 43 Join date : 2010-01-27
| Subject: Re: Raise the lvl requirement Tue Feb 16, 2010 11:04 am | |
| we can barely get 40+ to join, 50+ want a guild that can tank all there fb's adn bh and as of right now we can not | |
|
| |
Melain
Posts : 1 Join date : 2010-07-19
| Subject: True Mon Jul 19, 2010 3:30 pm | |
| I think we should raise the bar because if you realize if you go in guildive been in outlaws a while and so far i have never see any / most of the under 30 people i think 40 is a good limit because more poeple would join and we would get a stronger guild... Just My opion | |
|
| |
Mythika
Posts : 8 Join date : 2010-06-12 Age : 37 Location : Texas
| Subject: Ty for suggestion! Mon Jul 19, 2010 4:38 pm | |
| Ty for the suggestion and we have raised the bar 2 lvl 30+ but this will mean everyone will not make exceptions appreciate all of ur input and i dont believe we will be long in having a strong faction we all work very hard for our lvls and will continue to do so .......i am hoping! After this the bar may well need to be raised but as of now the bar is set at 30! <3 Mythika | |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: Raise the lvl requirement | |
| |
|
| |
| Raise the lvl requirement | |
|